The short answer
Workable is the best starting point for most teams, from $299 a month with published pricing and a 15-day trial. Breezy HR is the cheapest flat-rate option, from $157 a month billed annually. JazzHR suits small teams hiring a few roles at a time, from $1,000 a year. Greenhouse and SmartRecruiters fit larger teams and are priced on request.
Key takeaways
- Workable Standard costs $299 a month, or $3,588 a year, with texting, video interviews and assessments as paid add-ons.
- Breezy HR has no free plan; paid plans start at $157 a month billed annually, with a 14-day free trial.
- JazzHR Hero costs $1,000 a year billed annually and caps you at 3 job postings a month.
- Manatal is the cheapest per-user option here, from $15 a user a month billed annually.
- Greenhouse, SmartRecruiters and Lever publish no prices; every plan starts with a sales conversation.
Recruitment Marketing Platforms Compared at a glance
| Pick | Best for | Starting price | Free plan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workable | Teams that want published pricing | From $299 a month ($3,588 a year) | No, 15-day free trial |
| Breezy HR | Small teams hiring steadily | From $157 a month billed annually ($189 billed monthly) | No, 14-day free trial |
| JazzHR | First ATS for small teams | From $1,000 a year billed annually (Hero) | No |
| Manatal | Low-cost hiring per user | From $15 a user a month billed annually ($19 billed monthly) | No, free trial |
| Greenhouse | Structured hiring at scale | Pricing on request | No |
| SmartRecruiters | Enterprise high-volume hiring | Pricing on request | No |
| Lever | Mid-market teams that nurture talent | Pricing on request | No |
The seven recruitment marketing platforms at a glance
| Platform | Starting price | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workable | From $299 a month | 15-day trial | Teams that want published pricing |
| Breezy HR | From $157 a month billed annually | 14-day trial | Small teams hiring steadily |
| JazzHR | From $1,000 a year billed annually | No | First ATS for small teams |
| Manatal | From $15 a user a month billed annually | Free trial | Low-cost hiring per user |
| Greenhouse | Pricing on request | No | Structured hiring at scale |
| SmartRecruiters | Pricing on request | No | Enterprise high-volume hiring |
| Lever | Pricing on request | No | Mid-market teams that nurture talent |
How we chose
Seven platforms made this list because they cover the whole hiring funnel, from sourcing to offer, and they publish enough about their plans to compare fairly. Prices and plan limits come from each vendor's pricing page, checked on 14 November 2026. Lever's pricing page could not be read on that date, so its price is listed as on request and marked unverified in the price log. No hands-on testing was done.
1. Workable: best for teams that want published pricing
Workable is the most transparent platform on this list. Standard costs $299 a month, or $3,588 a year, and bundles recruiting and HR in one plan: candidate sourcing, an ATS with unlimited active jobs, a careers page builder, an HR information system, onboarding and time-off management. Premier costs $599 a month and adds texting, video interviews, assessments and referrals. Enterprise costs $719 a month and adds single sign-on and priority support.
Workable fits a team that hires regularly and wants to know the price before talking to sales. The sourcing suite covers 200-plus job boards and passive candidate sourcing, and the AI agents screen, source and engage candidates using credits: every paid account starts with 3,000 free AI credits.
The weakness is the add-on bill. On Standard, texting costs $89 a month, video interviews $109 and assessments $59. A team that uses all three pays $556 a month, not $299. Prices also rise with company headcount, so the $299 figure is the starting band, not a fixed price for every company size.
2. Breezy HR: best for small teams hiring steadily

Breezy HR charges a flat price per company, not per user, and every plan includes unlimited users and unlimited open positions. Startup costs $157 a month billed annually, or $189 billed monthly, and covers posting to more than 50 job boards, a branded careers site, interview self-scheduling, video interviews and email and calendar sync. Growth costs $273 a month billed annually and adds scorecards, interview guides, employee referrals, reference checks and e-signatures. Business costs $439 a month billed annually and adds offer management, approvals, custom roles and HRIS integrations.
Breezy fits a growing team that wants the price to stay still while headcount grows. Unlimited users means every hiring manager gets a login without the bill moving, and the price does not change as your company grows.
The weakness is the missing free plan. Breezy states plainly on its pricing page that it has no free plan, though you can try every feature free for 14 days. Its AI scoring tool, Breezy Intelligence, also runs on credits starting at $30 per 100,000 credits, so heavy AI screening adds a separate metered cost on top of the subscription.
3. JazzHR: best for a first ATS for small teams
JazzHR is the cheapest flat-fee option here for a small team. Hero costs $1,000 a year billed annually and includes applicant tracking, job postings starting at 3 a month, email templates and LinkedIn Recruiter integration. Plus costs $3,480 a year billed annually and adds AI-powered candidate matching, structured interviews and recruiting automation. Pro costs $5,508 a year billed annually and adds offers, e-signatures and advanced reporting. All three plans include unlimited users, and the price does not scale with headcount.
JazzHR fits a founder or small team making its first hire with a system. The flat fee and unlimited users make the cost predictable, and the vendor includes data migration from your current ATS on select plans.
The weakness is the Hero job cap. Three job postings a month is enough for one hire a quarter, but a team with four or five roles open at once needs Plus at $3,480 a year, which is more than triple the Hero price. JazzHR also has no free plan and no free trial shown on its pricing page.
4. Manatal: best for low-cost hiring per user
Manatal is the cheapest per-user platform on this list. The Professional plan costs $15 a user a month billed annually, or $19 billed monthly, for up to 15 jobs and 10,000 candidates. Enterprise costs $35 a user a month billed annually and removes the job and candidate caps while adding workflow automation. Enterprise Plus costs $55 a user a month billed annually and adds AI integrations, an open API, single sign-on and priority support. A free trial is available on every paid plan.
Manatal fits a solo recruiter or a small agency. One recruiter on Professional pays $180 a year billed annually, which is less than a single month of Workable. The AI features are unusually generous for the price: CV parsing, enrichment, AI recommendations and an AI copilot are included across the plans.
The weakness is the per-user meter. A team of ten recruiters on Professional pays $150 a month, and on Enterprise Plus the same ten people pay $550 a month. The caps also bite: 15 jobs and 10,000 candidates on Professional is fine for a small team, but a busy agency outgrows it fast.
5. Greenhouse: best for structured hiring at scale
Greenhouse is the structured-hiring standard for larger teams. Its plans are Core, Plus and Pro. Core covers sourcing and CRM, structured interview kits and scorecards, scheduling, reporting and single sign-on. Plus adds automation, texting, a business intelligence connector and sourcing automation. Pro adds unlimited CRM events, audit logs, a developer sandbox and enterprise-level security and data configuration.
Greenhouse fits a company that hires across teams, locations or brands and needs every interviewer asking the same questions and scoring the same way. The structured interview kits and scorecards are the product: they exist to make hiring fair and repeatable, not just fast.
The weakness is price transparency. Greenhouse publishes no prices. Its pricing page states that pricing is customized based on your organization's needs and that you should contact them for a personalized quote. That means a sales cycle before you know whether the budget works, and annual contracts priced by size and volume.
6. SmartRecruiters: best for enterprise high-volume hiring
SmartRecruiters is an enterprise talent acquisition suite, now part of SAP SuccessFactors. Its platform covers applicant tracking, CRM, an AI talent matching engine, candidate messaging, dynamic scheduling, job distribution and analytics, plus Winston, a conversational AI add-on for candidate chat across web, SMS and WhatsApp.
The weakness is access. SmartRecruiters publishes no prices and no self-serve signup; every plan starts with a conversation with an expert. A team of twenty people will spend more time in procurement than in the product, and the platform is built for enterprises, not for a startup making its first ten hires.
7. Lever: best for mid-market teams that nurture talent
Lever combines an ATS with a talent CRM, so candidates you cannot hire today stay in a pipeline for the next role. That nurture-first design is what sets Lever apart from pure tracking tools: sourcing, candidate relationship management and hiring analytics sit in one system.
The weakness is the same as Greenhouse: no published price and no self-serve trial. Lever's pricing page could not be read on 14 November 2026, so its price is listed here as on request and unverified. Expect an annual contract priced by headcount and seats, and ask for the full term, including renewal, before signing.
What a five-person hiring team pays in a year
| Platform | Yearly cost, 5 hiring users | What the money buys |
|---|---|---|
| Manatal Professional | $900 | 15 jobs, 10,000 candidates, AI copilot |
| JazzHR Hero | $1,000 | 3 job postings a month, unlimited users |
| Breezy HR Startup | $1,884 | Unlimited positions and users, 50-plus boards |
| Workable Standard | $3,588 | ATS plus HR, unlimited active jobs |
| JazzHR Plus | $3,480 | Up to 200 jobs, AI matching, automation |
| Workable Standard + 3 add-ons | $6,684 | Standard plus texting, video and assessments |
| Greenhouse | Pricing on request | Structured hiring, CRM, scorecards |
| SmartRecruiters | Pricing on request | Enterprise suite, AI matching, Winston |
| Lever | Pricing on request | ATS plus talent CRM |
The cheapest stack that covers real hiring is JazzHR Hero for a team with one or two roles open at a time, or Manatal Professional for a single recruiter. Workable's $299 a month looks steep until you count the HR system bundled into it; add the three add-ons and it costs $556 a month, which is where the comparison with Breezy HR Growth at $273 a month gets interesting.
Which recruitment marketing platform fits your situation
- One recruiter, tight budget: Manatal Professional at $15 a user a month billed annually.
- Small team, a few roles at a time: JazzHR Hero at $1,000 a year billed annually, with unlimited users.
- Growing team, price must not move with headcount: Breezy HR Startup at $157 a month billed annually.
- Regular hiring plus HR in one bill: Workable Standard at $299 a month, and budget for the add-ons you will actually use.
- Structured hiring across teams and locations: Greenhouse, priced on request.
- Enterprise volume, especially on SAP: SmartRecruiters, priced on request.
- Repeat hiring for the same roles: Lever, priced on request, for its talent CRM.
What the free plans and trials really allow
None of the seven platforms on this list offers a free plan. Breezy HR says so directly on its pricing page, and JazzHR, Greenhouse, SmartRecruiters and Lever show no free tier either. What you get instead is a trial: Workable offers 15 days, Breezy HR 14 days with every feature and 100,000 AI credits included, and Manatal offers a free trial on every paid plan.
That matters for budgeting. A trial is not a free tier, and the day it ends the bill starts. If you need to hire one person and then stop, a monthly-billed plan you can cancel beats an annual contract every time. Breezy HR and Workable both allow monthly billing at a higher rate; JazzHR's Hero plan requires annual billing.
Recruitment marketing overlaps with the CRM world more than most buyers expect: the talent CRM in Greenhouse, Lever and SmartRecruiters works like a sales CRM for candidates. The best CRM software list shows how those systems are priced, and the best lead generation software covers the sourcing side of the same funnel. If you work with an agency on hiring, the questions to ask a marketing agency guide is a useful checklist for the first call.
Common questions
What is the cheapest recruitment marketing platform?
Manatal, at $15 a user a month billed annually, is the cheapest paid entry on this list for a single recruiter. JazzHR Hero costs $1,000 a year billed annually with unlimited users, which is cheaper once two or more people hire.
Does Breezy HR have a free plan?
No. Breezy HR states on its pricing page that it has no free plan, but you can try every feature free for 14 days with no credit card. Paid plans start at $157 a month billed annually.
Why do Greenhouse and SmartRecruiters not publish prices?
Both sell annual contracts priced by company size, hiring volume and the modules you need. Greenhouse states on its pricing page that pricing is customized and you should contact them for a personalized quote.
What is the difference between an ATS and recruitment marketing software?
An ATS tracks applicants through hiring stages. Recruitment marketing software attracts candidates before they apply: career sites, talent CRM, sourcing and employer branding. Most platforms on this list do both, but Greenhouse and SmartRecruiters lean furthest toward the full hiring suite.
How much does Workable cost for a small company?
Workable Standard costs $299 a month, or $3,588 a year, and bundles recruiting and HR. Texting costs $89 a month extra, video interviews $109 and assessments $59, so a team using all three pays $556 a month.
Sources
- Workable pricing
- Breezy HR pricing
- JazzHR pricing
- Manatal pricing
- Greenhouse pricing
- SmartRecruiters pricing
- Lever pricing
Adziq sells marketing services and does not accept payment for placement in its articles. See our editorial policy.
