6 Best LLM SEO Analysis Software for AI Search

Which LLM SEO analysis tool fits your budget and prompt volume?

LLM SEO analysis software answers a different question from rank tracking: when a buyer asks ChatGPT or Perplexity for a recommendation, does your brand show up, and which pages do the models cite? The six tools below all do that job, but they split on price, prompt limits, and how far they go from analysis to fixes. Rank order here follows how much analysis a small team gets for the entry price, with enterprise-only tools last.

One warning before the details: prompt volume decides the bill. A tool that looks cheap at 20 prompts can cost triple at 100 prompts, because every prompt checked on every engine counts separately.

How we chose

The six tools below are ranked on what a small team gets for the entry price: how many prompts the cheapest plan tracks, how many AI engines it covers, and whether it stops at reporting or recommends fixes. Rankscale is cheapest at $20 a month, Otterly.AI follows at €29, then Peec AI at $95 and Scrunch AI at $250; Athena HQ and Profound publish no prices and sit last. Prices and limits come from each vendor's pricing page, checked on 14 November 2026. No hands-on testing was done, so this post compares published pricing and documentation.

1 1. Rankscale: best for cheapest entry with page audits

Starting price: From $20 a month ($17 a month billed annually, yearly only) · Best for: Cheapest entry with page audits · Skip if: you cannot pay annually, since the $17 rate is yearly-only

Rankscale tracks brand visibility across 17 or more AI engines, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, and Google AI Overviews, with sentiment analysis, competitor benchmarking, and citation analysis on every plan. Essentials costs $20 a month billed monthly, or $17 a month on annual billing, and includes 120 credits a month, which Rankscale counts as up to 480 AI answers, two brand dashboard slots, and 10 page audits a month. Higher plans rise to $99, $229, $385, and $780 a month, adding credits, dashboard slots, prompt research, query fan-out, and API access.

Rankscale fits a small team that wants the cheapest way into LLM analysis without giving up page audits. The audit allowance is unusual at this price: 10 page audits a month on the entry plan, rising to 200 on the top tiers. The weakness is the credit ceiling. Essentials covers 480 answers a month, which suits a small prompt set checked weekly, but a daily tracking habit outgrows it fast.

2 2. Otterly.AI: best for small teams starting with AI search

Starting price: From €29 a month (Lite) · Best for: Small teams starting with AI search · Skip if: you need more than 16 prompts tracked, since Lite covers 16 prompts

Otterly.AI tracks brand visibility and sentiment across seven AI engines: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Mode, Google Gemini, and Claude. Lite costs €29 a month for 16 prompts, equal to 2,000 credits a month, on four of the seven engines, with daily tracking, one workspace, and three recommendations a week. Standard costs €189 a month for 120 prompts and 15,000 credits, with unlimited workspaces, unlimited recommendations, API and MCP access, and a Looker Studio connector. Premium costs €489 a month for 403 prompts and 50,000 credits.

Otterly.AI fits a solo marketer or small team taking a first measured step into AI search. The credit system is transparent: one credit is one prompt checked once on one engine, and a prompt tracked daily on one engine uses 31 credits a month. The weakness is the Lite ceiling. Sixteen prompts cover a brand name and a few core topics, but not a full product range, and Claude answers cost three credits each.

3 3. Peec AI: best for daily tracking with recommended actions

Starting price: From $95 a month (Starter) · Best for: Daily tracking with recommended actions · Skip if: your budget is under $95 a month, since Peec AI publishes no cheaper plan

Peec AI tracks visibility, position, sentiment, and share of voice daily against competitors, across ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, and other models. Starter costs $95 a month for 50 prompts, three models, one project, and unlimited users, with daily tracking. Pro costs $245 a month for 150 prompts and two projects, and Advanced costs $495 a month for 350 prompts, five projects, and a Looker Studio integration. Enterprise is custom, with up to 26 models tracked.

Peec AI goes further than a dashboard. Every plan includes gap analysis that names the sources citing competitors but not you, ranked recommended actions, and an AI agent that can act on the findings. It also audits which AI bots your robots.txt allows, tracks AI referrals to your site, and checks claims AI makes about your brand against facts you set. The weakness is the entry price: there is no cheaper plan and no free plan, so a team with 20 prompts pays the same $95 as a team with 50.

4 4. Scrunch AI: best for site audits plus page fixes

Starting price: From $250 a month (Core) · Best for: Site audits plus page fixes · Skip if: you need more than 125 prompts, since Core caps at 125 unique prompts

Scrunch AI covers monitoring, analysis, and optimisation in one product. Core costs $250 a month for 125 unique prompts, 5,000 responses a month, five site audits a month, one brand workspace, and five user licences, across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Copilot. Enterprise is custom, with more prompts, nine models including Claude, Gemini, Grok, and Meta AI, full site audits, API access, and an agent experience platform.

Scrunch AI fits a team that wants the analysis to end in a fix. Core includes one page optimisation a month and basic content generation, plus sentiment analysis, insights and recommendations, and AI agent and bot traffic reporting. The weakness is scale. Core caps at 125 prompts, one persona, one language, and one country, so a team tracking several markets or languages needs Enterprise pricing, which is not published.

5 5. Athena HQ: best for action plans across 11 models

Starting price: Pricing on request · Best for: Action plans across 11 models · Skip if: you need a published price before a sales call, since Athena HQ lists no prices

Athena HQ tracks visibility across 11 models, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek, Meta AI, and Mistral, with unlimited topics, prompts, and competitors on both its plans. The Essentials plan includes 3,600 credits a month, one-month credit rollover, prompt and response analysis, content recommendations, and an Athena AI agent. The Enterprise plan adds the advanced content optimisation agent, multi-country and multi-language support, the Athena Citation Engine, persona targeting, SSO, and a certified GEO/SEO specialist.

Athena HQ fits a team that wants the tool to tell it what to do, not just what happened. Its recommendation engine, on-page and off-page action lists, smart robots.txt and llms.txt management, and self-learning content improvement aim at closing the gap between measurement and change. The weakness is pricing transparency: the pricing page shows plan structures and credit allowances but no dollar figures, so you cannot budget without a sales conversation.

6 6. Profound: best for enterprise teams with AI agents

Starting price: Pricing on request (free 7-day trial) · Best for: Enterprise teams with AI agents · Skip if: you need a self-serve paid plan, since Profound sells paid access as custom Enterprise

Profound's current product is an AI Marketer: an agent that researches, writes, reports, and collaborates with knowledge of your brand. The free trial runs 50 prompts a day for seven days across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, with limited agent credits. Paid access is a custom Enterprise package with tailored prompt tracking, up to 10 answer engines tracked, dedicated support, and SSO and SOC 2 compliance.

Profound fits a larger company that wants AI search insight folded into an agent that does marketing work, not a standalone tracker. Its answer engine insights cover how your brand and competitors appear across AI platforms, and its agent analytics track AI-sourced traffic and attribution. The weakness for smaller buyers is access: there is no self-serve paid plan and no published price, so a small team can trial it for a week but cannot buy a small plan afterwards.

What 50 prompts a day on three engines costs on each tool

Fifty prompts checked daily on three engines produces 4,500 AI answers a month (50 × 3 × 30). This table shows what that volume costs on each tool, using the credit rules on each vendor's pricing page.

Peec AI and Scrunch AI are the only tools whose published entry plans cover this volume. Rankscale and Otterly.AI need a step up, and Athena HQ and Profound need a sales quote. Check your own prompt count before budgeting, because halving the prompts or switching to weekly checks changes the answer completely.

Where LLM SEO analysis usually goes wrong

• Tracking too few prompts. Ten prompts produce noisy numbers that swing with each model update. Start with at least 50 prompts per topic, as Otterly.AI's own guidance suggests.
• Checking once and stopping. AI answers change when models update and when competitors publish. Daily or weekly tracking is the point; a one-off snapshot ages in weeks.
• Counting mentions without reading the answers. A mention that misstates your prices or features is worse than no mention. Check sentiment and factual claims, not just visibility.
• Buying prompts you never use. Every plan in this list charges by prompt volume or credits. Audit your prompt list quarterly and drop prompts that no longer match what buyers ask.
• Ignoring the citation gap. The most useful finding in these tools is which sources get cited for your competitors but never for you. That list is your content brief.

Five LLM SEO terms worth knowing

• Prompt: a question a buyer might ask an AI assistant, tracked to see whether your brand appears in the answer.
• AI answer: one response from one AI engine to one tracked prompt.
• Citation: a source link or domain an AI answer draws on. Citation share is the share of answers citing your pages.
• Share of voice: how often your brand appears in AI answers compared with competitors, for the same prompt set.
• GEO (generative engine optimisation): work that improves how a brand appears in AI-generated answers, as opposed to classic search rankings.

To compare the tracking side of this category, see the best AI search checking tool and the Google Search Console versus Google Analytics comparison. The best AI SEO rank tracking software post covers classic rank tracking, and is ChatGPT good for SEO explains what AI answers can and cannot do for rankings. Adziq's SEO services cover AI search visibility work for teams that want it done for them.

LLM SEO Analysis Software for AI Search at a glance

Common questions

Sources

• Rankscale pricing
• Otterly.AI pricing
• Peec AI pricing
• Scrunch AI pricing
• Athena HQ pricing
• Profound pricing

Adziq sells marketing services and does not accept payment for placement in its articles. See our editorial policy.